Backend vs Client-side Error Data Collection: Which is Better?

Hi j o., Please stand by as I search the Mixpanel knowledge base for an AI-powered answer. I normally take about 15 seconds or so. In case AI cannot answer your question, feel free to reach out to Mixpanel support at mixpanel.com/get-support. If you have follow-up questions for this thread, please tag me again with your question: @kapa.ai <follow-up question> 👋

Yes, it is generally better to handle error data collection on the backend (server-side) rather than client-side for Mixpanel tracking. Here are the key reasons why: 1. Reliability: Server-side tracking is more reliable and not susceptible to ad-blockers or other client-side issues. According to Mixpanel's documentation, client-side tracking can lose 30-50% of events due to ad-blockers.2. Data Consistency: Server-side tracking provides more consistent data across different platforms and devices. As stated in the Mixpanel docs, "Data is consistent across platforms" when using server-side tracking.3. Error Handling: Backend systems typically have more robust error handling capabilities and can capture more detailed error information.4. Data Quality: Server-side tracking allows for better control over what data is sent and when, improving overall data quality.5. Flexibility: It's easier to fix integration mistakes quickly with server-side tracking, as mentioned in the Mixpanel documentation.While server-side tracking does require some additional setup, such as custom code to track anonymous users across requests, the benefits in terms of data reliability and consistency make it the preferred method for error data collection.Mixpanel recommends: "We recommend tracking everything you possibly can via your servers, and only supplementing that with client-side tracking when necessary." Choosing the Right MethodFor implementation details, you can refer to Mixpanel's server-side SDKs or their HTTP API documentation.

ℹ️ Tip: Mention @kapa.ai in the thread for follow-ups or DM the app for 1-to-1 help.