Difference Between BigQuery and Snowflake Warehouse Connectors
What is the difference of warehouse connector between Bigquery and Snowflake?
What is the difference of warehouse connector between Bigquery and Snowflake?
Hi 河合 純., Please stand by as I search the Mixpanel knowledge base for an AI-powered answer. I normally take about 15 seconds or so. In case AI cannot answer your question, feel free to reach out to Mixpanel support at mixpanel.com/get-support. If you have follow-up questions for this thread, please tag me again with your question: @kapa.ai <follow-up question> 👋
Feel free to ask a follow-up question once I've answered by mentioning me with @kapa.ai
Based on the provided knowledge sources, there are some key differences in how Mixpanel's Warehouse Connector works with BigQuery and Snowflake: 1. Change tracking mechanism: - For BigQuery, Mirror (a sync mode) uses [table snapshots](https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/table-snapshots-intro) to track changes between sync runs [Docs > Tracking-methods > Warehouse Connectors: Sync data from your data warehouse into Mixpanel > FAQ > What will be the cost impact of this on my DWH?](https://docs.mixpanel.com/docs/tracking-methods/data-warehouse#what-will-be-the-cost-impact-of-this-on-my-dwh). - For Snowflake, Mirror uses [Snowflake Streams](https://docs.snowflake.com/en/user-guide/streams-intro) to track changes to tables or views [Docs > Tracking-methods > Warehouse Connectors: Sync data from your data warehouse into Mixpanel > Sync Modes > Mirror Part 3](https://docs.mixpanel.com/docs/tracking-methods/data-warehouse#mirror). 2. Setup requirements: - BigQuery requires granting specific permissions to a Mixpanel-managed service account and creating a new, empty mixpanel dataset [Docs > Tracking-methods > Warehouse Connectors: Sync data from your data warehouse into Mixpanel > Getting Started](https://docs.mixpanel.com/docs/tracking-methods/data-warehouse#getting-started). - Snowflake requires enabling change tracking on the table or view to be synced [Docs > Tracking-methods > Warehouse Connectors: Sync data from your data warehouse into Mixpanel > Sync Modes > Mirror Part 3](https://docs.mixpanel.com/docs/tracking-methods/data-warehouse#mirror). 3. Partitioned tables: - BigQuery can use partition metadata to skip processing unchanged partitions, making it more efficient for large partitioned tables [Docs > Tracking-methods > Warehouse Connectors: Sync data from your data warehouse into Mixpanel > Sync Modes > Mirror Part 3](https://docs.mixpanel.com/docs/tracking-methods/data-warehouse#mirror). - There's no specific mention of partitioned table handling for Snowflake in the provided knowledge sources. 4. Compute costs: - For BigQuery, the connector checksums all rows in the source table and compares them to a table snapshot from the previous run, which can be computationally expensive for large tables [Docs > Tracking-methods > Warehouse Connectors: Sync data from your data warehouse into Mixpanel > FAQ > What will be the cost impact of this on my DWH?](https://docs.mixpanel.com/docs/tracking-methods/data-warehouse#what-will-be-the-cost-impact-of-this-on-my-dwh). - For Snowflake, the compute cost is typically proportional to the amount of changed data, as Snowflake Streams natively track changes [Docs > Tracking-methods > Warehouse Connectors: Sync data from your data warehouse into Mixpanel > FAQ > What will be the cost impact of this on my DWH?](https://docs.mixpanel.com/docs/tracking-methods/data-warehouse#what-will-be-the-cost-impact-of-this-on-my-dwh).
These differences reflect the unique characteristics and capabilities of each data warehouse platform and how Mixpanel's Warehouse Connector adapts to work efficiently with each.
kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
ℹ️ Tip: Mention @kapa.ai in the thread for follow-ups or DM the app for 1-to-1 help.